Partly Cloudy
56°
Morris, IL
Partly Cloudy|Forecast »

Don’t kid yourself, archery is expensive for bow hunters

Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

AUSTIN, Texas (MCT) — When I got into bow hunting, I naively thought that I would save some money on equipment and get lots of extra hunting time with the special season.

After all, once you’ve bought the bow, all you need are a few arrows, maybe some points, a face mask and some smell-good scents, and you’re in business.

Not so fast Natty Bumppo.

This is America, the land of consumerism, where bigger means better and better means more.

As I recall, my first bow, with a dozen arrows and a carrying case, cost me $1,200. The last one, with no carrying case and no arrows, cost me close to $1,500. Arrows run about $100 a dozen, and, between shooting hogs and targets, I go through a couple of dozen during the year.

Mechanical broad heads run about $12 each in a package of three, and I’ll use three or four packages each year. Throw in field points for practice and fixed broad heads for hogs, and there’s another $150 every year.

Then, I have to buy a couple of pop-up blinds every year, because they just don’t make those things to last. That’s another $300-400. Scents will set me back $30 a season, and I’ll buy some new kind of camouflage every year, so figure another $50-75 for that.

What I’m getting at here is that hunting costs money; bow hunting costs real money.

Take binoculars and range finders, for example.

Ordinary binoculars will not do when you’re bow hunting.

Unless you want to be chasing wounded animals or watching your $10 arrow go sailing off into the atmosphere, you better have some kind of range finder hanging from your neck when you’re hunting.

I’ve been using Leica binoculars when I’m stand hunting. They are good and light, but I still need a range finder. Ideally, the binocular and range finder are in the same piece of equipment, but that can run $3,000 to $4,000.

I tried regular range finders for a while, then switched to Leuopold’s range finder binocular. That was less than optimal, since you had to adjust the eyepieces for every distance. Essentially, you were blind except at one range. And they were — are — clunky and heavy.

Previous Page|1||

Comments


Reader Poll

What is your stance on a proposed 1 percent sales tax to fund local school building projects?

I'm in favor of anything that will help improve school finances
I will support it if it helps to lower my property taxes
I oppose it because I don't believe it will impact property taxes and I will just pay twice
I'm against any additional taxes
I have not heard enough yet to form an opinion