Fair
71°
Morris, IL
Fair|Forecast »

Conservatives in US House open to additional disaster relief for Northeast

Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

(Continued from Page 1)

The federal government has spent $1.5 billion responding to Sandy already, Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., said after a briefing with Craig Fugate, administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

FEMA has enough money to meet current needs for food and temporary shelter, Lautenberg said, but there is only about $6 billion in reserve and that’s not nearly enough to rebuild.

Lautenberg compared the scope of the damage to Katrina, which he said cost the federal government more than $100 billion. And he urged his Democratic colleagues at a closed luncheon to be ready to help the region.

“One of the pleas that I made in our lunch just now is to remember our hurricane is not different than another state’s volcano, drought, (or) flooding, and it is likely every state that’s here is going to at some point or another feel the violence of nature as we continue to abuse it and ignore the fact that global warming is here, is real and we have to get on with preparing for it,” Lautenberg said.

He said “the stage is set” after voters rejected a government-is-bad message to upgrade Eisenhower-era infrastructure to face the more frequent severe storms predicted from climate change.

“You have to be prepared for these things,” he said. “We’ve ignored the ravages of environmental abuse.”

But Rep. Scott Garrett, R-Wantage, came away from the same briefing with a different impression. He said the Office of Management and Budget was still determining what kind of reconstruction needs there would be, and projects could take years to complete and therefore would not need funding all at once.

Some projects could have been scheduled for repairs or replacement already since they were older and worn out, so they might be able to access regular federal or state funding for those types of projects, Garrett said.

“Once we know what we need, the answer may not be what everybody’s already been sort of chiming about, more money to FEMA, more money to FEMA. The answer may be if you need a long-term project for ‘X’ building or something like that, the money should come from (Housing and Urban Development Department) housing program.

Comments


Reader Poll

What is your stance on a proposed 1 percent sales tax to fund local school building projects?

I'm in favor of anything that will help improve school finances
I will support it if it helps to lower my property taxes
I oppose it because I don't believe it will impact property taxes and I will just pay twice
I'm against any additional taxes
I have not heard enough yet to form an opinion