Mostly Cloudy
73°
Morris, IL
Mostly Cloudy|Forecast »

Gas station plan fueling outrage in Tinley

Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

(Continued from Page 1)

"That property the way it's zoned, a gas station can go on there," said Zabrocki, who urged residents to negotiate with McEnery.

The land, all zoned by Will County, has been slated for commercial development since the 1990s, said Will County Senior Planner Mike Smetana.

If McEnery hadn't requested the permits for the liquor sales and drive thru, there would have been very little chance of even delaying the start of construction, said Dan Tarlock, a law professor at Chicago-Kent College of Law.

As it stands, even if local officials were to vote down Lenny's proposal, they likely would just be inviting a lawsuit from McEnery. Residents' complaints about potential traffic congestion, crime, pollution, noise or even declining property values are all legitimate concerns, but were supposed to have been considered when local governments were figuring out how to zone the community, Tarlock said.

"Those are all arguments that you would make when the (zoning) ordinance was passed," Tarlock said, noting that similar protests often crop up in "transition" areas between zoning for homes and commercial or industrial land. Residents can sue to stop construction, but property developers' rights are strong in zoning fights, Tarlock said.

A better solution might have been for a zoning ordinance that provided for a buffer zone of lighter commercial businesses, but "once the ordinance is already in effect... it's pretty impossible to challenge," he said.

Tarlock noted that residents could sue over health threats or nuisances caused by the station — but only after the business is open if it becomes a nuisance.

"That's very cold comfort," he said.

||2|Next Page

Comments


Reader Poll

What is your stance on a proposed 1 percent sales tax to fund local school building projects?

I'm in favor of anything that will help improve school finances
I will support it if it helps to lower my property taxes
I oppose it because I don't believe it will impact property taxes and I will just pay twice
I'm against any additional taxes
I have not heard enough yet to form an opinion