Mostly Cloudy
77°
Morris, IL
Mostly Cloudy|Forecast »

HUD secretary says administration seeks to get Jersey Shore open for business

Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

(Continued from Page 2)

“What the governors gave us is not, ‘Congress has to pass $82 billion,’ ” Donovan said at the hearing. “It’s, ‘These are the damages, let’s work with you to figure out what needs to be covered by the federal government.’ ”

The Obama administration has said it’s committed to taking a close look at issues that have an impact on the Jersey Shore and ways to ensure it’s ready for the summer tourism season.

The administration is also considering asking Congress to change limitations on FEMA’s programs to expedite funding as well as resources to help small businesses not only deal with damages, but lost customers and tourism, Fugate said. For example, he said a homeowner without insurance would only be eligible for up to about $30,000.

State Sen. Paul Sarlo, whose district includes Moonachie and Little Ferry where the storm caused severe flooding and destroyed homes, said as residents are filing claims with FEMA, they’re learning they may not get as much as they anticipated and now their frustrations are turning into anger.

“The immediate response always is FEMA will be there for you, but there’s many limitations FEMA has been placed under from Congress,” he said.

Fugate said the federal government is also trying quickly to approve estimates and distribute reimbursements because many New Jersey municipalities run on a calendar year and need to close their books Dec. 31.

FEMA will also be looking to borrow money from Treasury because its flood insurance program doesn’t have big enough reserves to cover the expected exposure from Sandy, Fugate told reporters.

“We’re going to be looking at increased borrowing authority based on the number of claims that are being filed and looking at available cash on hand so we have included in our request what additional borrowing authority we’ll need,” he said.

|||3|Next Page

Comments


Reader Poll

What is your stance on a proposed 1 percent sales tax to fund local school building projects?

I'm in favor of anything that will help improve school finances
I will support it if it helps to lower my property taxes
I oppose it because I don't believe it will impact property taxes and I will just pay twice
I'm against any additional taxes
I have not heard enough yet to form an opinion