Partly Cloudy
65°
Morris, IL
Partly Cloudy|Forecast »

County panel OK with dispatching for Seneca's calls

Majority of entities Grundy ETSB serves must approve the addition

  Comments (...)
Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

The Grundy County Rules Committee approved providing Seneca with dispatch services through the Grundy County ETSB. Its recommendation will go to the full county board in Janurary.

The Grundy County Emergency Telephone System Board (911 board) is currently asking the 15 members for whom it provides dispatching service to approve an agreement adding Seneca ETSB and the village of Seneca.

In June 2012, the 911 board's executive committee approved a dispatching fee of $75,000 to take on Seneca police, fire and EMS calls. In addition, Seneca will pay a one-time impact fee of $15,000.The fee was determined by the board's finance committee based on call volume and legal fees.

Of the 15 parties, a majority have to approve the addition for Seneca to officially be added. So far, only a few have take action on the Seneca agreement.

Most recently, the Grundy County Rules Committee voted in favor of it at its Dec. 28, 2012, meeting. The Rules Committee's action is a recommendation to the Grundy County Board, which will vote on it Jan. 8.

"Coal City has some concerns, but I think in the long run it is a good thing. The more additions, the more benefits," said committee member Ann Gill.

County board Vice Chairman David Welter said the dispatch center has cost the county quite a bit of money and, in order for it to start saving the county money, more municipalities need to be added to the service agreement.

The 911 board is also currently working with Braidwood on the possibility of adding its dispatch calls as well. It approved offering Braidwood services for $80,000 a year, plus the one-time $15,000 fee.

NEXT CONTRACT

The 911 board's finance committee is still working on a new formula for the next dispatching service contract for all the parties, said Ron Severson, county board chairman at the Rules Committee meeting. The current contract is a three-year deal that will expire in 2014.

For the first contract, Grundy County and Morris took on the bulk of the cost to allow for the other agencies to adjust to the new budget item. Morris and the county have always paid for dispatch costs and were prepared for it, whereas the other parties have not paid for this service previously.

Previous Page|1||

Comments

Total Comments
2

View/Add Comments

Most Recent Comment

Smoke n Mirrors wrote on January 2, 2013 10:26 a.m. ...
(Continued from Page 1) Statements were made in the past, that these new bonds were replacing other old “paid off” bonds so no increase in the County’s budget would be needed…..did we forget that fact? Or more smoke and mirrors to pass their agenda? The County wanted a brand new building to add to their property rolls. Let them pay for it…alone. Bring forward the subject of staffing. It looks great to add to the numbers of the family contributing to the monthly budget….but the politicians seem to ignore the need for more groceries…..What is the staffing plan when these additional agencies are added? Public safety is at risk by adding more calls to a current staffing/call ratio (staffing numbers already decreased) to squeeze out a few more dollars to pay off bonds of a building that was already budgeted and not necessary when other venues were clearly available. (That sentence was a mouthful….but so is this debacle.) Do the politicians even know the amount of staff time it takes to handle one emergency 911 call? One police transmission? One traffic stop? One fire call? It’s not just simply answering a phone anymore. Layers and layers of legislative rules have changed all of that. Back door tax increase, disregard for quality service. Answers need to be given. Will there be honest debate at the January 8th County Board Meeting? Will there be any debate?

Reader Poll

Were you impacted by last week's flooding?

Yes, but only inconvenienced by closed streets
Yes, water got close, but everything worked out OK
Yes, I had to evacuate my home or workplace
Yes, my house sustained extensive damage
No, I managed to avoid it all