Fair
61°
Morris, IL
Fair|Forecast »

Pompei: Bears’ offense neglected for far too long

Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

(MCT) — CHICAGO — There is no need for Phil Emery to be locked into hiring a head coach with an offensive background.

But there is an overwhelming need for him to be locked into hiring someone who has foolproof answers on how to fix the offense.

And that probably means the Bears should hire an offensive guy.

Emery has a clear vision of what he is looking for, and he knows what he’s doing. The Bears general manager has made excellence priority No. 1 in a head coaching hire.

He won’t settle for an offensive mind who might not be as strong a leader or administrator. And he shouldn’t. But he should exhaust all offensive options in the head coaching search.

This coaching change really is all about offense, and the Bears’ offensive problems are beyond chronic.

They are institutional.

One reason for that is offense rarely has been prioritized by this organization. Offense almost always has been the redheaded stepchild, while the defense has been the golden child.

That was all well and good 30 years ago, but that doesn’t work anymore. Offense is king, and if you aren’t bowing at its throne, you will be feeling its wrath.

Since assistant coaches have had specialties, the Bears have hired one head coach with a true offensive background — Abe Gibron 41 years ago. And good old Abe was to the modern offense what a blunt club is to the smart bomb.

When Mike Ditka came to the Bears in 1982, he mostly had been a special teams coach. And the majority of Jim Dooley’s assisting experience when he became head coach in 1968 was on defense.

All of the other Bears head coaches — Jack Pardee, Neill Armstrong, Dave Wannstedt, Dick Jauron and Smith — were defensive specialists.

The Bears are not unlike a lot of teams though. More than half of the head coaches in the NFL this season had defensive backgrounds.

That’s because good offensive minds are like deep blue diamonds. There aren’t enough of them to go around, so we settle for what we can get.

Previous Page|1|||

Comments


Reader Poll

What is your stance on a proposed 1 percent sales tax to fund local school building projects?

I'm in favor of anything that will help improve school finances
I will support it if it helps to lower my property taxes
I oppose it because I don't believe it will impact property taxes and I will just pay twice
I'm against any additional taxes
I have not heard enough yet to form an opinion