Partly Cloudy
75°
Morris, IL
Partly Cloudy|Forecast »

Ash Borer cost could be $1.5 million

  Comments (...)
Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

(MCT) — Highland Park officials will soon be faced with paying for a program to remove more than 6,000 public ash trees that are expected to fall prey to the emerald ash borer that has infested the area.

City Forester Joe O'Neill said Highland Park has 4,125 ash trees of various varieties on public parkway, plus as many as 2,000 more on publicly maintained areas such as the bicycle trail. A five-year projection shows it would cost $1.52 million to remove infected trees and plant replacements.

That schedule, which includes consistent annual costs, could be sped up if the current drought continues, O'Neill said.

Emerald ash borer beetles pose "an attack on the vascular system of the tree, essentially, and that's what conducts the water from the roots to the crown of the tree," O'Neill said a recent committee-of-the-whole meeting of the city council. "And the fact that it's already stressed from the drought, it doesn't take much damage to show more effect on the tree."

Highland Park first detected the emerald ash borer in 2011, and expects it to destroy all the ash trees in town. Those trees on private property are also susceptible and must be treated or removed at the owners' expense.

Councilwoman Sally Higginson proposed identifying ways for private owners to work with the city to find economies of scale when several trees are being removed from specific areas of town. Such collaborations may not bear fruit for private homeowners because they are not required — as the city is — to hire contractors at prevailing wage, according to Highland Park Public Works Director Ramesh Kanapareddy.

Councilman James Kirsch recommended seeking private contributions to help the city respond to the predicament.

"This is a community-wide problem and I know this is a community that loves their trees," said Kirsch, who is not running for re-election in April. "As you go through the budgeting cycle, I think it's going to be important to get community buy-in and see what kind of alternative sources of revenue we can come up without raising permit fees or taxes in order to accomplish this goal."

Previous Page|1||

Comments

Total Comments
0

View/Add Comments

There have been no comments made about this story.

Reader Poll

What is your stance on a proposed 1 percent sales tax to fund local school building projects?

I'm in favor of anything that will help improve school finances
I will support it if it helps to lower my property taxes
I oppose it because I don't believe it will impact property taxes and I will just pay twice
I'm against any additional taxes
I have not heard enough yet to form an opinion