Fair
90°
Morris, IL
Fair|Forecast »

How ATF agents lost dangerous weapons while trying to nab criminals

  Comments (...)
Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

(Continued from Page 1)

As with the rest of the sting, the charges issued focused on the operation’s successes, while embarrassing failures — guns stolen from an agent’s vehicle, sensitive documents left behind, cases where the wrong person was charged — were kept quiet until exposed by a Journal Sentinel investigation.

The burglary reports, for instance, do not mention the store was an ATF operation. The agent in charge is listed as the store owner. The reports say nothing of sensitive items or government goods, simply listing some stolen property as “misc. items of significant value.”

The ATF’s machine gun — stolen from an agent’s SUV just weeks before the storefront burglary — remains on the street.

“I have never heard of, in my 30 years of doing criminal justice issues, an undercover operation that seemed to be as novice as this,” said Laurie L. Levenson, a former federal prosecutor who is now a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles. “From the crooks’ point of view, they were the ones in charge, not the ATF. It is just embarrassing.”

The police reports and uncharged burglaries raise new questions about failures in the operation and whether steps were taken to cover up mistakes. The documents, along with criminal charges and extensive interviews, shed more light on how an extensive 10-month undercover operation backfired.

While the operation resulted in charges against about 30 people, most were on minor drug and gun counts. However, federal officials note a few of the defendants face long prison terms.

In the wake of the Journal Sentinel’s original investigation, a bipartisan group of congressional members is demanding answers from the ATF on what they call a “failed operation.” The agency has launched an internal investigation and has sent investigators from Washington, D.C., to question those involved.

ATF spokesman Mike Campbell said the bureau’s Office of Professional Responsibility is performing a “top to bottom review” of the operation, following the Journal Sentinel investigation.

The results of the review will be sent to ATF management and Department of Justice leaders, he said. After that, agency officials will discuss publicly what the review found. Campbell said he could provide no timetable for the completion of the review.

Comments

Total Comments
0

View/Add Comments

There have been no comments made about this story.

Reader Poll

Were you impacted by last week's flooding?

Yes, but only inconvenienced by closed streets
Yes, water got close, but everything worked out OK
Yes, I had to evacuate my home or workplace
Yes, my house sustained extensive damage
No, I managed to avoid it all